![]() Personally I use arch because I want to learn rather than for any other reason, although the high stability and customizability as well as the rolling release model certainly help. While it's certainly possible to take something like manjaro or ubuntu and strip them of the stuff you don't want, it's more of a patch solution, not quite as "elegant", although you'll barely notice any difference anyway. The "point" of arch is supposed to be full customizability and no preinstalled stuff that you may not need or want, as well as clean code and bleeding edge updates. As for manjaro, there really is nothing wrong with using a distribution that does all you need out of the box, however (contrarily to the "arch way") that places it in the same cathegory as something like ubuntu - which does not make it bad, it just makes it something different. That is why it is a good idea to know how it's done instead of relying completely on yaourt. There are the odd few packages that I have to manually build from time to time. In my experience, while yaourt is supremely useful sometimes it just won't work. We're just in the middle and are looking for cooperation from mainline arch and its userbase. RHEL and others have a completely different view on that. It just bugs me that arch users think the only way to get your software is soon after it is released. ![]() I've been using Manjaro for a couple years now and the only compatibility issue that I've had was with proprietary software. To me this seems like a classic example of elitist arch mentality "Your distro has a vetting process and it's own repo's? Then it is inferior and breaks compatibility." In reality the packages are held back for maybe a week if it's not important. ![]() The only issue I can see people having is if they use the AUR to get fresh out of the oven packages and then expect everything to be perfect. This is different from arch, but a common practice on just about every other distro. ![]() They want them to work with manjaro and everything on the official repo's. The whole reason manjaro does hold back packages is precisely for stability and compatibility. It doesn't time out or show any errors it just doesn't do anything. Mine isn't so much that it's slow, but that sometimes it just won't load a page. So I guess my main concern is: does yaourt come strictly from AUR, or could I be downloading something potentially harmful? Also along those lines Is there anything potentially harmful in AUR, or is it regulated? I got brackets and sublime text working perfectly with yaourt. So far I haven't broken anything with it. Every distro that's easy to get going has some bloat. I know there's some bloat, but I don't care. So I go with Manjaro so that if I do break my OS then I can just pop the USB stick back in and have it up and ready to go again within an hour. I've installed Arch before and gone through all that, but I just think it's silly to have to deal with that all the time unless it's something you really like to do for fun, but personally I need my laptop to always be working so I can use it for school. Like you said, I just don't feel like spending tons of time getting everything to work when I could just type in one line and hit Y a couple times and have it up and running. Like is everything safe or am I going to accidentally download a virus thinking it's from a reliable source when really I have no idea? I guess the thing that bothers me is if yaourt is completely reliable or not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |